Recent Episodes
Episodes loading...
Recent Reviews
-
N4newfyWhy the biasThis podcast is so pro-William and Kate and so negative about Harry and Meghan that it gets annoying to listen to. Why do they have such bias? I enjoy other podcasts that present a more neutral view and treat both couples fairly.
-
PonteLasPilasBit of royal gossipGenerally amusing, unless you worship Harry and his wife. It’s about the Royals, not the used to be royals.
-
S.SummertimeDuke of??If you are going to represent the Royals in a podcast, please learn how to say Edinburgh thought I heard Edinburg!!! Oy🤦‍♀️
-
berni2012Americans who are pro-British monarchy; this is strangeThese are American hosts who are pro-British monarchy; this is strange. The USA was founded as a result of a rebellion against the British monarchy that is responsible for centuries of crimes against humanity around the world.
-
Verts WifePASS!!!This podcast bashes H&M every episode but almost every title is something about H&M. Give it a break!!! Report on the royals as a whole. AND GEESH slow down!!!
-
Soleil_382Prince Harry and Meghan Markle CoverageThis is a US podcast that is obsessed on reporting about Prince Harry in an unfavorable light. If I wanted to hear negative, biased reporting on Montecito royals, I would read disinformation in UK press or enforce racism by UK royal reporters.
-
AmyacpaSloppy pronounciationsPlease work on this. It’s not hard and if you want to speak with authority, it’s a really good idea.
-
Priestess KimClearly Partial to Traditional MonarchyThe only reason I looked for this podcast is because of Harry and Megan. I was surprised at how much you stand by the antiquated monarchy and love to refute whatever Megan says with pure speculation that has nothing to do with who these people are. The way y’all try to paint her as this shallow, one-dimensional, petty woman reveals your bias. Then you continually slam Harry for his book and insist that everyone is sick of his whining. Dude. You girls are NOT GETTING IT. THE MAN WATCHED PAPARAZZI KILL HIS MOTHER! She was a Light in this world who is unmatched in her radiance. We LOVED Diana! Harry is systematically breaking down the illusions that were handed down to him and sharing his healing in the process. On this most recent episode, I could not believe it when you said, “Archie doesn’t need security.” !!! Are y’all reading from a script you’ve never read before? Of course this family DESERVES security! Prince Harry didn’t ask to be born into this and I definitely don’t think he needs to be punished for getting HIS family out of it. That doesn’t mean they shouldn’t have titles or security, it doesn’t mean they “want it both ways”; it means they are Forever Famous and intend to direct their own lives in a healthier way.
-
Murderhornet1Audio is unacceptableif you’re going to be branded under a media outlet atleast make it professional
-
dhbcnkSlow down please!This is a lovely podcast but girls you are speaking way to fast! Breathe a little. A Royal observer from the US.
-
amy01153226Don’t like ChristinAThere are 2 hosts Christine snd ChristinA - ChristinA has a very harsh voice and speaks fast but in a very bored tone. She stumbles over a LOT of her pronunciations (seriously- you didn’t practice Mikhail Barishnikov ?) she sounds like a dumb hung over sorority girl. The other host is ok.
-
Joan GoldBalanced newsThis podcast is getting better. I appreciate that the presenters try to be balanced. I love that they are willing to tell the truth about the horrible, childish behavior of Meghan and Harry “no longer royals”.
-
Lolo13419Tried listening again and can’t.Horrid
-
Lilly101669Lead Host Talks Way Too Fast!The lead commentator talks way to fast like she is vomiting the information she has to her audience. The only person worth a hear is Tom Sykes from the Daily Beast. Why not give him a Poscast? With all of the Royal books being published this year and the Royal happenings going on, they have not had one of the authors on the podcast or any guests with gravitas. Becomes a bore of two youngish uninformed women who to those with REAL Royal knowledge it seems are just reading from the supermarket headlines. Not a lot here.
-
snackapooRoyally UsI like this podcast and following eight,which includes this one. I gave all of them five stars. These ladies keep us American Anglophiles up dated and they know what their talking about.8-3-22.
-
MS parentSlow down!I enjoy listening to a variety of podcasts, some with celebrities, some about Royals, about health etc. However, this is the first podcast that I ever had to turn off because the speed at which one of the hosts was talking literally made my head spin. I even checked my phone several times to make sure I didn’t have it on double speed. The host (who does not reside in England) flies through the information so unnecessarily fast. In episode 24 about Kate, I felt like the audio was truly sped up. Slow down. Listeners can handle more than 24 minutes of information. Plenty of podcasts last longer than 30 minutes! I appreciate the brevity however I would more than be glad to listen to a podcast that is 35-45 minutes or longer if she would just speak at a regular pace. This is not enjoyable listening. Also… Would love if it was more conversational. It seems like the fast host has her agenda and points she wants to get through and does not respond to what the other host is saying. Again, not enjoyable.
-
nomadvalPlease Slow Down.. and ListenAs a BRF enthusiast, I desperately want to love this podcast - but I cannot get past the one host. She speeds through every sentence and topic that it makes me feel like I have word whiplash - and I love Gilmore Girls, so that's saying something. ;) I don't know if she is on a time crunch, but if she could just move through things with a little less loud & fast talk it would make this podcast so much more enjoyable. (I've tried listening in a slowdown pace - it doesn't help it..) And she also needs to listen to what the other person is saying, and respond in turn instead of rushing to say the next thing on her talk agenda. She could really be good at this, if she could just take a breath and practice active listening. :) Otherwise - an overall decent podcast if you want a basic overview of the weekly Royal happenings. They usually have great guests as well.
-
Lau__raEasy listenbut please please turn off your device notification peeps while recording!!
-
usedtolovecharlesNopeI love royal news but this is not news and I can no longer abide Russell’s unhinged hatred of Harry and Megan. This is despite the fact that practically every episode featured them. Goodbye Elli Olsen
-
iSusanJoyObviously biased propaganda and boring podcastCan’t help but wonder how many pounds sterling Camilla, Charles, and William have slipped to these bland and boring propagandists. Shameless hacks without any interesting gossip or info deemed scandalalous that might anger the palace machinery. Camilla? Never Charles’s bloody tampon or a scheming and manipulative faithless wife who cheated on her husband and gaslit Diana for years. Nope, she’s an exemplar of honor and integrity to the UK! Right. Hard pass and gagging at this shameless Fox News-level cover up and fluffy silly propaganda that whitewashes the royal family.
-
LandlessGentryUpdatedWow, it seems you all have given in to the senseless Meghan/Harry bashers, who hate Meghan and Harry for moving on and simply existing on the planet, breathing air. Goodbye.
-
jeffersBKUnfortunately, hosts/guests are resoundingly biased against Harry and MeganI love hearing about all things royal, but man do the hosts not care for Harry or Megan. They love them some William and Kate, though. It’s too bad because William and Kate have just as many faults as Harry and Megan.
-
princess liz aultHonorI think that the royal family needs to be more supportive of what goes on
-
Jeet1000BiasedIf you want to hear royal news where “best guesses” as to what the royals are thinking are voiced and the facts are relayed with a strong bias, then you found your podcast. One of the hosts actually said “Me-Gain” in reference to the Duchess of Sussex and referred to Prince Harry as “Fergie 2.0”. Trash.
-
ChicagoGalsLove itFun and insightful. There is always something new they have gotten their hands on!
-
Yoli2013Not based on factsThis podcast is so biased and filled with unfounded claims. I listened to several episodes and couldn’t find anything remotely factual. Awful!
-
MorkinderParaphrasing: T. Markel will never see Lilibet (?)I am an American who grew up exposed to the historical aspects of the British Monarchy. Of course, my attention always leaned towards the fanfare of it all. Fast forward to the last year. With the pandemic, I was ecstatic to find the royal world of podcasters. Initially, I started listening to your podcast and others on a regular basis. However, over the last six months I have noticed a change regarding how royal news is presented. Instead of letting the listeners hear the latest Royal news with a few of your funny or personal experiences which relate to the the stories - it has deviated. I have noticed obvious bias comments made towards particular royals and political figures. Yes, President Biden was visiting England, Her Majesty the Queen and all that entails. Most of your report was informative. However, there was absolutely no need to share your dislike and disapproval of formal President Trump when reporting on the current Royal events. Absolutely no need! (Your cohost asked a question about why the Queen attended the meeting on the beach. Yes, you answered the question, but you could have recognized the Prime Ministry of England, Boris Johnson while talking about politics & in England. Now, that is important information. He is elected as POTUS is elected. You could have added or reiterated the fact that the PM and Queen Elizabeth meet once a week to discuss…) You are a journalist, I should never know your view on politics ~ in this format. Report the Royal news ~ good or bad ~ with an appropriate disposition and that is it. This podcast is not your platform! Also, I should never know by the tone in your voice or adding your personal little side comments, which royals you favor over others. Subscribers listen to certain podcast because we enjoy the content or wish to escape issue(s) you raised today. You displayed a lack of professionalism during this podcast!
-
Navywife513Thoroughly enjoy!Thoroughly enjoy!
-
cleareyedgirlNeeds fact checking.As someone who has great respect for Oprah Winfrey, I was shocked at the lack of fact checking in the interview she did with Megan and Harry. Since the interview some of the things that Megan Markel said have been proven patently false. This podcast would be far more interesting if it investigated without basis. Without that it presents as piece of fanfiction.Very disappointing. By the way, my politics are liberal, and my parents fought for civil rights.
-
KGKG8383838383Incredibly offensiveYou should really evaluate how your words impact people suffering from mental health. Your characterizations of Harry and Megan are incredibly damaging and triggering
-
alysesykesFresh takeSo excited to see Rachel Burchfield on the latest episode! She brings such a new and fresh perspective these topics!
-
SlothLovesChunkDitzy, Real Houswives-style biased “news”I wanted to try a new podcast on the Royals. Unfortunately, I couldn’t get more than a few minutes through this. It’s immediately evident that this podcast is biased toward Meghan and Harry, and it sounds like I’m listening to Bravo’s Real Housewives discussing them after a few glasses of Walgreens’ house brut. I like to hear straightforward reporting with nobody’s opinion, because I like to form my own. If you love H&M, are sadly ditzy, and need someone to feed you an opinion, you’ve found the show.
-
NaomiBurtonBad rating due to subject matterListened to a couple of shows and then deleted from library. US Weekly is only going to be biased so they don’t offend Meghan so they can get a cover interview. I feel that the Meghan followers in general are exactly like Trump followers, cult like.
Similar Podcasts
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork on this page are property of the podcast owner, and not endorsed by UP.audio.