This show is more about Scott’s ego and hate for the right. It has switched to 30% business and 70% hate and propaganda. Scott acts like he cared but only if it strokes his huge ego.

I used to like him.

The Best Interview I have listened to, he is clearly an intelligent well articulated leader!!

Hearing Carney in such a knowledgeable, thoughtful and elegant fashion just drove home how uninformed , crass and inarticulate is our president. Anyway for Mark to get American citizenship by 2028?!?!

Prof G, thank you for sharing your wisdom with the world

I feel smarter after every pod. One of my go-to’s!

I enjoy these podcasts and appreciate the things Scott has to say; however, I wish he and his guests wouldn’t use the F word on the podcast (or at least edit it out). I’d love to share these podcast episodes with others and especially with my kids but won’t because of the occasional language.

Your ego is out of control. The vulgarity at the beginning is unnecessary. Telling us The View hosts are brilliant is the equivalent of telling the public that we had a fully functioning President Biden. How gullible do you think we are??

I can't remember how but two years ago I heard about Scott. I picked up the book the algebra of wealth and I really enjoyed it. I consider myself a conservative. And these guys are pretty solidly liberal. I don't mind it. I like to hear their opinions and ideas. In terms of how the show is formatted and executed, It is perfect. I'm very very very excited to have daily episodes.! that will be in June and I can't wait. Keep up the good work, lads. Ps: Scott likes to joke around egomaniacally, it's terribly cringe lol. But do you "daddy" lol

Scott I love you but listening to 10 minutes of how great all your private super exclusive clubs are is beyond off putting. Yes, you came around to why it might be bad at minute 11. It was akin to hearing you talk about the fancy fox hunt in English Countryside. Stop drinking so much of the Koolaid. Yuk! Your strengths are many and are anchored in who you are at your core. Someone your mother would be proud of. Anne Schmauss

Prof G and his introductory 12 MINUTES of lifestyle douchbaggery subtracts from a rest fine program with a great guest. Thank goodness for fast forward and accelerated speed settings. Somebody please get this poor guy an editor & leave the debauchery on the cutting room floor.

Right now Xi is saying to himself: should I sell all China’s U.S.T’s or blockade Taiwan ?? “We have the determination, the ability and the preparedness to deal with Taiwanese independence, and if we do not deal with it, we will be overthrown.” Xi 2016

If you are going to have her on you have to fight her on every piece of nonsense or gaslighting she spews. You didn’t.

I really like the Raging Moderates podcast. Scott Galloway has great and thoughtful insights and Jessica Tarlov is great too which is impressive when you consider she has to hang out with Fox News crazies all day. Surprised by the number of negative reviews here but I suppose that reflects our polarized society. Professor Galloway is a busy man and this week Ms. Tarlov interviewed Kelly Ann Conway sans the good professor. This was almost unlistenable. I am fine with having pro Trump voices on the podcast but they should have some modicum of credibility. Ms. Conway can only offer low quality, tired spin and propaganda.

Kellyanne blew Jessica out of the water.

White Middle class Voters have to be convinced that they have much more in common with the poor & minority voters than with wealthy/billionaire voters. Programs such as affirmative action are a small percentage of the budget. Repugs have exploited those programs to further divide the country just like they do with government departments they don’t care like.

Kellyanne is a ridiculous guest.

I love you both. Listen every week & pass it on to everyone I know. But I could not stomach more than 5 mins of Kelly Ann ConJob!!!

Scott should interview motor mouth Kellyanne Conway and she’d meet her match. Jessica Tarlov’s interview was a disaster either saying she agreed with Kellyanne’s deep Maga rants or stating a quick opinion and saying she had to move on. The republicans are not short on motor mouths. Remember Karen Hughes, George W’s mouthpiece? C’mon Scott, you have the chops to take her on. Invite her on your show and see if she accepts. She knows when she’s up against someone formidable, so I’m guessing she doesn’t.

1 star and unfollowed because of the episode with Kellyanne. She’s is not moderate she is an extremist. I didn’t think this show was supposed to be Fox News. Good concept, bad practice.

Kelly Anne is a whataboutism on steroids.

Liars should not be platformed. That does not make you fair it makes you complicit. Shame Shame Shame

As a 75 year old disabled female Attorney, who was able to marry at 41 and my husband died and I was 66 Did these guys actually interview anyone? They are clueless as to all of the pressures that I encountered. Get rid of the monopoly first start there.

Love the show

And let your guest talk. Get some sleep.

I keep listening to the show, but I’m not sure what about this is moderate. I suppose they have the raging part correct. I could summarize this whole show by the following. “Trump is crazy, Democrats aren’t doing enough.” Which while true, is a little frustrating.

The Prof seems to be a little bit of a whiner.

Refreshing to hear Scott w/o the whiny, narcissistic, name dropper Kara in the background.

I’m retired 70 years old, my wife who is also 70 lived in south Florida. We had enough of Trump and Republicans. Sold everything, purchased a home in Bucaramanga Colombia. That was a good move.

Scott puts a lot of thought in what he says. I eagerly await the pods to hear what is to be said and the guests who are on. Another thing I like is that Scott is not afraid of correcting himself.

I recently heard you on Jay shetty’s Podcast. I found you very interesting! I like your prospective! Have you ever sat down with Jared Issaceman? Highly recommend!

I am a big fan of Prof G and appreciates young Ed’s takes too. I’m not a fan of people like Mel Robbin’s and Jay Shetty and skip episodes with guests like them.

Thank you for speaking truth!!

It is always the woman’s fault. Sherry Redstone (not Sumner), Sheryl Sandberg (not Marky Z), Cathie Wood (not any other dude in finance), and of course, all the women (certainly not Don Lemon). In his spare time, he’s happily laundering news for Ian Bremmer. The political show in this feed is awful too.

I enjoy the range of voices on this podcast. I especially enjoy Jessica in this environment. She is so much more at ease with these discussions. Instead of band of degenerates she usually deals with on Faux. She is amazing both places. I don’t always agree but I believe these are such important topics. Thank you for being a beacon of sanity in an insane (trump) world.

Cannot get through a Raging Moderate episode. Innnsannnneee nails on a chalkboard

Scott is SOO much better without Kara

The playbook being implemented particularly by Elon / DOGE is a mirror image of Milei in Argentina. But, as Scott mentioned, the US is not Argentina, which needed a massive shock to get out of a death spiral. This is purely IDEOLOGICAL, coordinated by the richest man in the World, prescribing “tough medicine” on the poor and country, knowing he will continue to rake in government and foreign contracts.

Great pod. Entertaining, funny, but full of value. Whether it’s the business insight, political talk, or the personal growth conversations, I often leave with some better knowledge about the world around me. Worthy listens.

I know men and particularly young men are what Scott cares about. Fine. But it is hard to understand why he doesn’t see that all the stuff he points out have been problematic for women and girls FOREVER. I just listened to the episode about young men having no sex, performance concerns, etc. Okay. Women have had problems with orgasm since the beginning of time. Nobody cares. No viagra. Nothing. Why doesn’t that even get an acknowledgment?

Why does Scott not play golf? He lives in England. Has homes in Florida and Aspen. Travels the world. Has 2 sons that should learn the game. He is athletic and works out. Great game.

They need help with their feelings and confidence If it's about developing meaningful relationships as you claim. Ppl have personality and attachment disorders. You cannot do anymore for the boner, all the meds are available. There are just so many other ways you could have addressed this but you're just pushing an app. I bet you're an investor. Barf.

Love Scott abd Ed but they need to HONESTLY explain why they didn't see DeepSeek coming because investors (including plenty of people who listen to this pod) lost a TRILLION dollars today. How did you guys miss this??

I’ve been a loyal subscriber for sometime and have mostly enjoyed the content… until recently. While I like to be challenged, I don’t enjoy listening to a bitter partisan rant. Life is rich, Scott. Knock it off and maybe some of us will come back.

Prof G, I loved your book, “Algebra of Happiness” and many other great things you’ve produced. Some of the best gifts friends have ever received from me (I.e., framed four leaf clover) are from Red Envelope - loved that business you created. However, you may have jumped the shark. You’re calling our President names (I’ve never voted for him) and using expletives to describe him? Please have some respect for that office. I’m not a fan of every President, but I never call them names. I’d suggest following Michelle Obama’s advice of “when they go low, we go high”, but she skipped the inauguration (lack of respect) and she’s probably “not proud of her country” AGAIN. Billions of people would die, to live in this country and many have died to protect us and keep us free. Staying on politics…Jessica Tarlov IS NOT MODERATE and it’s obvious to everyone. How is Andrew Huberman an expert on every topic he’s asked about? I’ve recommended your books and podcast to so many people and have learned from you a tremendous amount. Thank you, but I’m not going to listen anymore.

Raging moderates: An excellent concept for a pod, more discussion is needed in this vein. Like myself, Prof G is a bonafide left-of-center rager. But Jessica Tarlov is something much farther to the left who, at least for the moment, lacks the objectivity or perhaps the depth of knowledge or the heart and ability to frame a much needed moderate's perspective. This has been an issue since the segment kicked off, but really hit home in Tarlov's defense of DEI and the LAFD's response to the Los Angeles wildfires. Newsom, Bass, and LAFD Chief Crowley placed deeply unpopular ideology/politics over competence, capacity, and readiness. LAFD gets plenty of funding if spent wisely. Crowley and her direct reports were hired by this ideology, which each of them proudly carry into the operations and hiring of their organization, subordinating quality across the LAFD. Tarlov's claim is that Crowley is competent which, at best, is a haphazard strawman; the question is whether Crowley was best to lead the department, and how would she optimize performance in a department that is critical in such times. A raging moderate would have spotted the inherent weaknesses of LA's leadership and questioned their personnel strategy, rather than leaping to Crowley's defense. A moderate would at least understand that DEI practices place undue skepticism on minority staff. A moderate would also understand the huge pricetag Democrats pay for the indulgence of identity politics, including lost elections, the opportunity to govern, and fading support for core liberal issues. Ironically, we are now also seeing a reversal of decades of slow but steady progress for equality and tolerance. And a curious moderate would be spending more time assessing California's post dumpster-fire political landscape.

An out of control ego with repetitive messaging for the lost. A sidekick who is the Opie to Andy but more and more frequently the smarter of the two. The big ego says he wants to be the most influential voice in the history of business!? Move over Elon, Donald and just about every Fortune 1 million CEO. Politically motivated opinions mixed with off color jokes and self-praise. I got started when he stuck to valuable economic and market insights. The rest is just a boring.

Using the word “bold” for Trump’s agenda — dead giveaway. At least you’re transparent.

Listened for a few weeks and had to unsubscribe when SG made the argument that the genocide of Palestinians is justified and required, even after the guest he had (and expert on the topic) told him point blank that what Israel is doing will only make things worse.

I think this used to be great / amazing Pod … I just wish the conversation could find its way back to its core and focus on business, (and being positive). The constant politics has just gotten too much for me. I’ll prob still check it out … but just not part of my weekly practice anymore. Make this pod great again :)